The question of aligning investments with personal values, specifically environmental concerns, is increasingly prevalent amongst estate planning clients. Steve Bliss, as an estate planning attorney in San Diego, frequently encounters individuals seeking to ensure their wealth not only benefits future generations but does so in a manner consistent with their ethical and sustainable principles. While a trust allows for a great deal of customization, dictating *specifically* that all assets must be held in environmentally screened funds requires careful consideration and precise drafting. Approximately 68% of investors now express interest in sustainable investing, indicating a strong and growing demand for this approach (Source: Morgan Stanley Institute for Sustainable Investing). This represents a significant shift from traditional investment strategies, prompting a need for adaptable trust structures.
Can a trust dictate investment choices?
Generally, a trust document *can* dictate investment choices, but the level of control varies. A trustor (the person creating the trust) can establish broad guidelines, such as excluding investments in certain industries (like fossil fuels or tobacco). However, mandating *only* environmentally screened funds presents complexities. Trustees have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries, which traditionally centers on maximizing financial returns. Imposing overly restrictive investment criteria could be seen as a breach of that duty if it demonstrably lowers potential returns, unless the trust explicitly prioritizes social or environmental impact alongside, or even above, financial gain. It’s crucial to balance personal values with prudent investment management.
What are the limitations of restricting investment options?
Restricting investment options, particularly to a specific niche like environmentally screened funds, can limit diversification, potentially increasing risk. A diversified portfolio spreads investments across various asset classes and sectors, mitigating the impact of any single investment performing poorly. Concentrating solely on environmentally screened funds might reduce access to certain high-performing assets or sectors, impacting long-term growth. The trustee must demonstrate that the chosen funds are not only environmentally responsible but also meet reasonable risk-adjusted return expectations. A recent study showed that while sustainable funds generally perform comparably to traditional funds, performance can vary significantly depending on the specific fund and market conditions (Source: MSCI ESG Research).
How can I balance values with fiduciary duty?
The key is careful drafting. Steve Bliss emphasizes the importance of clearly articulating the trustor’s intent. Instead of a strict mandate, the trust document could state a *preference* for environmentally screened funds, allowing the trustee some flexibility. Alternatively, the document can define specific criteria for acceptable investments, focusing on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors, and instruct the trustee to prioritize funds that meet those criteria whenever reasonably possible. This approach provides guidance without eliminating all investment options. It’s also wise to include a provision indemnifying the trustee against losses resulting from prioritizing ESG factors, acknowledging the trustor’s deliberate choice to prioritize values alongside financial returns.
What happens if my trustee disagrees with my investment preferences?
If a trustee believes that a strict mandate for environmentally screened funds violates their fiduciary duty, they can petition the court for instructions. The court will consider the trust document, the trustor’s intent, and the trustee’s fiduciary obligations. Steve Bliss often advises clients to include a dispute resolution mechanism in the trust document, allowing for mediation or arbitration before resorting to litigation. This can save time, money, and emotional distress. It’s also helpful to have a clear understanding of the trustee’s investment philosophy and values before appointing them.
I once knew a woman named Eleanor, a passionate environmentalist, who meticulously crafted her trust to solely invest in green energy companies.
She envisioned her legacy as a force for positive change. However, her trustee, a seasoned financial advisor, quickly realized the limitations. The available green energy funds were relatively new and lacked the diversification needed for long-term stability. He raised concerns about potential underperformance and the risk of losing a significant portion of the trust’s value. Eleanor, steadfast in her beliefs, refused to compromise. Over time, the trust’s value lagged behind comparable portfolios, and Eleanor, deeply disappointed, felt her vision of a powerful environmental legacy was slipping away. It was a painful lesson in the importance of balancing values with pragmatic investment strategies.
However, I also worked with a family, the Andersons, who wanted to incorporate sustainable investing into their trust.
They weren’t interested in a strict mandate but wanted to express a strong preference. We drafted a clause stating that the trustee should prioritize investments with high ESG ratings, specifically focusing on companies demonstrating strong environmental stewardship. The clause also included a provision allowing the trustee to deviate from this preference if it demonstrably harmed the trust’s financial performance. The Andersons also established a “mission-related investment” pool, allocating a portion of the trust’s assets to direct investments in environmentally beneficial projects. This approach allowed them to align their values with their financial goals, creating a legacy that was both financially secure and environmentally responsible.
Is it possible to create a ‘hybrid’ approach to sustainable investing in a trust?
Absolutely. A hybrid approach, combining broad investment guidelines with specific ESG criteria, is often the most effective way to balance values and fiduciary duty. For example, the trust document could instruct the trustee to invest in a diversified portfolio of stocks and bonds, while simultaneously prioritizing funds with high ESG ratings within each asset class. This allows for diversification while still ensuring that the majority of the investments align with the trustor’s values. The trust document can also define specific “negative screens” – industries or companies to avoid – and “positive screens” – companies or industries to favor. Steve Bliss recommends consulting with a financial advisor specializing in sustainable investing to develop a customized strategy that meets the trustor’s specific goals and risk tolerance.
About Steven F. Bliss Esq. at San Diego Probate Law:
Secure Your Family’s Future with San Diego’s Trusted Trust Attorney. Minimize estate taxes with stress-free Probate. We craft wills, trusts, & customized plans to ensure your wishes are met and loved ones protected.
My skills are as follows:
● Probate Law: Efficiently navigate the court process.
● Probate Law: Minimize taxes & distribute assets smoothly.
● Trust Law: Protect your legacy & loved ones with wills & trusts.
● Bankruptcy Law: Knowledgeable guidance helping clients regain financial stability.
● Compassionate & client-focused. We explain things clearly.
● Free consultation.
Map To Steve Bliss at San Diego Probate Law: https://g.co/kgs/WzT6443
Address:
San Diego Probate Law3914 Murphy Canyon Rd, San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 278-2800
Key Words Related To San Diego Probate Law:
probate attorney
probate lawyer
estate planning attorney
estate planning lawyer
Feel free to ask Attorney Steve Bliss about: “What assets should not go into a trust?” or “How are taxes handled during probate?” and even “How do I retitle accounts in the name of a trust?” Or any other related questions that you may have about Estate Planning or my trust law practice.